As the only full-time HR specialist at a 90-person software company in Denver, Angela Simmons is used to doing a lot with limited time. For a recent hiring round for a mid-level product manager, she received 47 serious applications from a mix of job boards and referrals.
The candidates weren’t the problem. The volume of files was.
One Role, Dozens of Files
Over three weeks, Angela’s inbox and applicant tracking system filled with:
- Resumes in PDF and Word format
- Cover letters as separate PDFs
- Portfolio links and attached case studies
- Internal recruiter notes exported as PDF
When the hiring manager asked, “Can you send me everything in one place before our shortlist meeting?” her first instinct was to zip a folder and fire it off. But she had seen that go badly before: managers missing files, skimming only two or three resumes, or ignoring cover letters entirely because they were buried in a separate directory.
What the hiring manager was really asking for wasn’t just “access.” He wanted a curated packet that he could scroll through on a tablet or print as a single stack.
Why a Zip Folder Wasn’t Good Enough
Angela identified several friction points with her old approach:
- Decision fatigue: Managers having to decide which file to open first.
- Fragmented impressions: Reviewing a resume and cover letter in different windows reduced context.
- Lost notes: Her recruiter comments—often critical—lived in separate PDFs that didn’t always get opened.
She needed to create something closer to a hiring dossier: one document per candidate, and if possible, one master file for the entire role.
Redesigning the Hiring Packet
Angela decided that, for this role, each candidate should be represented by a mini bundle:
- Resume (1–2 pages)
- Cover letter (if submitted)
- Key notes: source, salary range, initial impressions
- Selected portfolio PDF pages (for the 12 candidates who included them)
To make this manageable, she first standardized everything into PDFs. Word documents were exported, and any web portfolio pages that mattered were saved to PDF.
Then she opened her browser and went to https://pdfmigo.com. For each candidate, she dragged in their resume, cover letter, and any notes or case-study pages, arranging them in the same consistent order: resume first, then letter, then notes/portfolio. With one click on Merge PDF, she generated a single, labeled PDF per candidate.
Filenames followed a simple pattern: PM_Candidate_01_Ahmed_Khan.pdf, PM_Candidate_02_Briana_Lee.pdf, etc.
Assembling the Master Review File
With 47 candidate-level PDFs ready, Angela created one more asset: a master hiring packet that would serve as the “front book” for the role. Inside it, she placed:
- A 2-page overview of the role and requirements
- A table listing all 47 candidates with key details (experience, location, referral/source)
- Then, each candidate’s merged PDF, in ranked order of initial fit
The result was a single document around 160 pages long—but highly structured. The hiring manager could:
- Skim the summary to get oriented
- Jump to any candidate by page number
- Print only the top 10 if he wanted a physical stack
Instead of asking, “Where’s that one resume from the fintech person?” he could scan down the table, find the candidate, and flip directly to the right section.
Effects on the Hiring Process
Over the next two weeks, Angela observed several changes in how the hiring team operated:
- More thorough review: Managers actually opened and read cover letters because they were attached immediately after each resume.
- Faster shortlisting: The first decision meeting took half the usual time; everyone literally “had the same document in front of them.”
- Clearer communication: When discussing a candidate, they could reference a single page number rather than juggling multiple attachment names.
Angela also found it easier to onboard a new interviewer mid-process. Instead of forwarding a dozen attachments, she shared the master PDF and said, “Start at page 12—everything you need is there.”
Archiving and Audit Trail
After the role was filled, Angela stored the master packet and top-candidate PDFs in the company’s HR archive. Months later, when leadership wanted to revisit the talent pool for another role, she didn’t have to reconstruct the search from scattered files.
One master file told the entire story: who applied, who was interviewed, and what materials they originally submitted.
What This Means for Small HR Teams
Angela’s experience highlights an overlooked reality of modern hiring: tools have made it easier than ever to collect applications—but not necessarily to present them coherently.
By shifting from “send every file” to “build one structured packet,” she:
- Reduced noise for her hiring manager
- Protected context around each candidate
- Created reusable patterns for future roles
She still evaluates candidates on skills, experience, and culture fit. But now, the way she delivers those candidates’ materials reflects the professionalism she expects on the other side of the interview table.
